This site may contain outdated or incomplete information.
Repojacking exposed private repositories through supply-chain compromise
White hat researchers reported repository confusion attacks (“repojacking”) to at least 35 public companies. By creating packages in public package repositories with the same name as internal packages (and, in some cases, larger version numbers than the internal package), build systems within the targeted companies would download the malicious packages from the internet, running arbitrary package-installation code during the build process.
Impact
According to the author, reporting these issues to the affected companies yielded at least $130,000 in bug bounties (Shopify: $30k, Apple: $30k, PayPal: $30k, Microsoft: $40k), with additional companies named including Netflix, Yelp, and Uber.
Remediation
The remediation steps depended on the package manager in question; additionally, some configurations of software repository software such as JFrog Artifactory were also implicated in this confusion between public and local libraries. Remediation was was performed on a per-repository or per-build basis within individual organizations.
In most package managers, it was also possible to change package configuration
flags (e.g. --index-url
rather than --extra-index-url
for pip install
),
but it’s not clear that this applied to all package managers.
Type of Compromise
This was caused by configuration of the package manager, and therefore is closest to the “Negligence” root cause, though the actual misconfiguration may have occurred in administrators of the build system or or build tooling, and could also be considered “Dev Tooling”.
References
- Dependency Confusion: How I Hacked Into Apple, Microsoft, and Dozens of Other
Companies,
<https://medium.com/@alex.birsan/dependency-confusion-4a5d60fec610>
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.